A huge pet peeve of mine is administrators who design programs for their constituents that do not work. A program on campus designed to help underrepresented students get into graduate school is focusing a lot of time and energy on GRE preparation. The rationale is that students have been performing poorly on the GRE in recent years, so focusing on GRE prep will help increase scores. However, this does not work. It has never worked, and it probably will not work in this case.
High stakes testing (e.g., Iowa Test of Basic Skills, ACT, SAT, GRE, LSAT, etc.) has been repeatedly shown to predict nothing about the ability of a student to perform in school or in society. At best, these tests display students’ abilities to multiple guess. Lipman (2002) tells us that extensive focus on these tests in schools is actually correlated positively with lower scores. Belgrave and Allison (2006) note that “These efforts to improve test performance result in an overall narrowing of the educational opportunities available to students in lower-performing schools as schools increase their focus on test performance.” Furthermore, “In contrast, at higher-performing schools, teachers are described as focusing on developing richer curricula and promoting the value and love of learning.”
I personally know talented and brilliant students and people in the work force who want to return to school, but are paralyzed in their educational development, simply because they are scared to death of the GRE! Either they have been out of school for a while and do not think they would be able to succeed, or they took the test at one point and scored very low. Either way, these people are inhibited from reaching their goals because of a multiple choice exam that does not tell much about their capabilities. I think such tests should be done away with. Of course, this would mean that administrators and educational institutions would have to work harder to determine the capabilities of students by reading submitted writings and truly analyzing a student’s academic history and potential. God forbid these academics and administrators actually have to evaluate students’ potential and abilities.
The worst part is that I can present a case to a program that clearly shows how focusing on GRE prep will not only not improve scores, but decrease scores by adding anxiety and narrowing global educational initiatives. I can give recommendations as to how a program can increase scores by increasing student morale and excitement about learning in general. I can give examples of educational institutions that have done away with high stakes testing, and even standard letter grading, which resulted in more well rounded students who achieved more educationally and professionally. Only, since the government has determined, devoid of research, that GRE prep is mandatory for low scoring students, this program will sabotage yet another class of potentially high achieving students by bogging them down with worries over a single test. I just don’t get it.